Skip to content

The Twelve Days of Apostasy, Day One: Liberal Theology

December 23, 2014

The Twelve Days of Apostasy

Martin Luther, in his battles with Rome over the doctrine of justification by faith alone, questioned the canonicity of the Book of James. In his preface to James, he famously called it an “epistle of straw.” [Later Luther regretted his comment, and removed it from future editions of his preface to the book]. 

I submit that the book of James is critically important for those who wish to discern the errors of our time. James focuses our attention to the various causes and symptoms of “false faith.” He asks “Can that faith save you?” Investigation of the current ecumenical mindset has led me to see a strong connection between the warnings by James and the many varieties of “fallings away from the faith.” 

In the spirit of the season I have decided to document twelve movements that exhibit “falling away” tendencies, one for each of the “twelve days of Christmas.” Click on “The Message” link for a prescription for the apostasy. 

[Please note that I am NOT making any claim that particular Christians who are part of these movements are unsaved! Further, many truths may be taught and practiced by those who hold to these teachings. What I am suggesting is that the abuses found in the movements promote apostasy]. The links to the opinions of others may differ from those of my own.

The purpose of this series is to warn the wayward and to encourage evangelism. James concludes his letter: Brethren, if anyone among you wanders from the truth, and someone turns him back, let him know that he who turns a sinner from the error of his way will save a soul from death and cover a multitude of sins. James 5:19. 

Strike up the music:

 On the first day of apostasy, James is warning me… of LIB-ER-AL THEOLO-GY.


Apostasy #1 – Liberal Theology 

Keyword(s) from James: Doubting (James 1:6)

Teaching: The Social Gospel

Beginnings: Enlightenment, Modernity

Motto:Homo Mensura (Man the Measure)”

Early Influencers: Schleiermacher, von Harnack

Mouthpiece: World Council of Churches

Effects: Social Engineering

Cultural Icon: Scopes Monkey Trial

Adherents: U.S. Mainline Churches, Western European State Churches

Interesting reading: A Humanist Manifesto (link) 


Click Here for A Message to “Liberals”


 I. Doubting. For he who doubts is like a wave of the sea driven and tossed about by the wind. For let not that man suppose that he will receive anything from the Lord for he is a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways. James 1:6b-8. Without faith it is impossible to please God… Heb. 11:6. Many liberal theologians doubt: 

  • the Bible is the word of God (it is only a witness)
  • the deity of Christ
  • the historicity of Adam and Eve
  • original sin
  • fulfilled prophecy
  • miracles
  • the resurrection of Jesus
  • the virgin birth
  • the existence of Satan and demons

II. Liberal theologians employ a method of interpreting the Bible known as higher criticism. In liberal theology, higher criticism begins with an attitude of doubt rather than a loving appreciation of the Scriptures. Since it starts from doubt, it creates theories that deny that books of the Bible are what they seem to be. The Pentateuch was not written by Moses, but rather is a compilation of four different sources (J, E, P, D). The book of Daniel is given a second century B.C. date to deny its prophetic nature. The words attributed to Jesus in the book of John were not taught by Him, but were attributable to disciples who never knew Jesus. The Christian religion evolved into something that was contrary to the historical Jesus. (link to the Jesus Seminar). 

Jesus is deemed to be a wise teacher, an ethical example to follow. Liberal theologians stress the social teachings of the gospels. The penal substitution of the cross as a propitiatory sacrifice is denied. 

III. Beginnings. The Age of Enlightenment refers to the period beginning in the 18th century when advances in science and technology led many to develop a philosophy of rationalism. All problems could be solved solely through the use of human reason. Society only needed more education to bring about a utopian state. Human aspirations should not be focused on the next life, but solely on the improvement of this one. 

IV. Motto: Man is the Measure of All Things: of the things that are, that they are; of the things that are not, that they are not. This is a statement from the pre-Socratic Greek philosopher Protagoras. I use this as the motto of liberal theology because of its man-centered reliance on human wisdom. Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? (1 Cor. 1:20). The cross is foolishness to the worldly mind. 

V. German theologian Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834) is known as the father of liberal theology. He taught that the Bible was not the revelation of God, but rather a record of human religious experiences. Doctrine and dogma were downplayed and the experience of “god-consciousness” was stressed. Adolf von Harnack (1851-1930) was a Lutheran theologian who wrote the influential book Essays on the Social Gospel. He denied the historicity of the Gospel of John and the miracles of the Bible. He rejected the resurrection and the virgin birth. 

VI. World Council of Churches. Based in Geneva, Switzerland, this organization of inclusivism was formed in 1948 to promote “Christian” unity. It is a conglomeration of 349 global, national, regional and local church assemblies. It promotes a false movement of peace and unity through social activism. 

VII. Social Engineering. The human problems of our planet need to be solved using scientific methods on a worldwide scale. The programs are promoted primarily through centralized governments. 

VIII. Scopes Monkey Trial. A 1925 legal case concerning the illegal teaching of evolution in Tennessee. Williams Jennings Bryant argued for the prosecution; Clarence Darrow represented Scopes. The teacher was found guilty and fined $100. The case was appealed to the Tennessee Supreme Court, which upheld the ruling. The case was a watershed moment in the differing worldviews of biblical Christianity and secular humanism. 

IX. Mainline Protestant Churches were once the majority of Christians in the U.S. Over the last fifty years these churches have lost considerable membership. The mainline churches include the United Methodist Church, Presbyterian Church (USA), Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the Episcopal Church, the American Baptist Churches, the Reformed Church in America, and the United Church of Christ. In 1999, the Lutheran World Federation entered into a theological agreement with the Roman Catholic Church on the doctrine of justification.


Coming tomorrow:  

The second day of apostasy.


In Christ,



Holy Day of Obligation: The Assumption of Mary

August 12, 2014

Is Attendance Mandatory? What are the rules?

Friday, August 15 2014 is a Holy Day of Obligation for certain Catholics. Here are the rules:

1) The first precept of the Church states that attendance at mass is mandatory on all Holy Days of Obligation.

2) Those who deliberately fail in this obligation commit a grave sin. (Catechism section 2180)

3) The faithful are bound …to abstain from those labors and business concerns which impede worship (Catechism section 2193 and the fourth precept of the Church)

4) In the following countries the Feast of the Assumption is NOT a holy day of obligation:

Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Philippines, The Netherlands.

5) The State of Hawaii has received an indult that voids the required obligation.  For the other 49 United States, the day is a required Holy Day.

6) The following rules apply if you are traveling:

If you are traveling FROM your home country that has a required Holy Day TO a country that does not, no attendance is required, and

If you are traveling TO a country that has a required Holy Day FROM your home country that does not, no attendance is required. (Can. 13.2)

Background on the Feast of the Assumption:

The Feast of the Assumption was first celebrated in the 6th century.  The Assumption of Mary is the only ex cathedra infallible pronouncement of a pope. Pope Pius XII declared it an infallible truth on 11/1/1950. It is a cardinal dogma that Mary was taken body and spirit into heaven, where she reigns as Queen.

The feast day may originally have been based on a 4th century document “The Account of St. John the Theologian of the Falling Asleep of the Holy Mother of God.” It is assumed (sorry) that Mary died during the reign of Tiberius Caesar, around the year 35 AD. According to the writing, all the apostles were miraculously transported to Bethlehem to witness the Assumption: Peter from Rome, Paul from Tiberia, James from Jerusalem. Paul stated he was snatched away while preaching “no great distance from Rome, in the country of Tiberia.” This is problematical, since Paul did not visit Rome until his imprisonment there in 61 AD. In fact, his conversion on the road to Damascus likely occurred in 37 AD. You can read the account of the Assumption here.



Catholicism’s “Marvelous” Unity; and Blowing Up Bridges

June 12, 2014
When I Saw Her, I Marveled Greatly
Christian unity is a persuasive argument used to convert  evangelicals to Catholicism. Here is testimony of former evangelical Russell Stutler, at
“What happens when Christians reject the authority of Peter’s successor? Today there are over 30,000 Protestant denominations and independent churches, each with its own interpretation of the Bible, and the number keeps growing…I finally realized that I had to end my own church hopping and submit to the teaching authority of the one church that Jesus built on a rock, with the direct successors to Peter and the apostles still leading it under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.”


Rome claims to be the one, true church. “For it is through Christ’s Catholic Church alone, which is the universal help toward salvation, that the fullness of the means of salvation can be obtained.”[1]  Rome claims a unity in the one faith received from the apostles; she claims unity of divine worship, through the sacraments; and she claims historical unity (based on apostolic succession) with one head, the Pope. There is also a uniformity of liturgy that promotes solidarity. When you eat at McDonald’s, you know what to expect. Similarly, wherever you attend mass you can expect the same liturgy to occur.


Is Christian unity to be found in Roman Catholicism? What does Catholic unity look like? We shall explore nine marks that distinguish the unity of Catholicism. Then, we will answer the charge of Evangelical disunity. 


Mark #1: It is an Adulterous Unity


According to Rome, every sincere person alive in the world today belongs, however imperfectly, to the Roman Catholic Church. 


“All men are called to this catholic unity of the People of God…And to it, in different ways, belong or are ordered: the Catholic faithful, others who believe in Christ, and finally all mankind…Those who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church…The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims…Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart…who try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience — those too may achieve eternal salvation.” [2]


Jesus says that we must enter through the narrow way – by trusting in Him alone. Catholicism promotes her broad way, either through ceremonial water baptism or in the case of unbelievers, a “baptism of desire.” It is a mystery how Muslims and unbelievers are part of the Body of Christ. Nevertheless, Rome claims that it is so. Rome commits “spiritual adultery” when she incorporates unbelievers into her fold. An example of her flirtatious behavior occurred in 1986 at the World Day of Prayer in Assisi: video here. So, Rome’s unity is inclusive and adulterous. True unity is exclusive and chaste.


Mark #2: It is an Impure Unity


How do you bind together an inclusive “church?” The unity of Roman Catholicism is not an organic unity of like-minded believers in Jesus, who is our Vine. Rather, it is a syncretistic union that exists by the permissiveness of Rome. J.A. Wiley writes, “As a corporation, having its head at Rome, and stretching it limbs to the extremities of the earth, she is of gigantic bulk and imposing appearance; but, closely examined, she is seen to be an assemblage of heterogeneous materials, held together simply by the compression of force. It is a coercive power from without, not an attractive influence from within that gives her being and form… It is combination, not incorporation; union, not unity, that characterizes the Church of Rome.”[3]


The entry (overnight) of countless unconverted pagans into the Church at the time of Constantine; the inclusion of unconverted Africans and Native Americans, who practice animism mixed with Catholicism; Dominicans opposing Franciscans; Jesuits battling Benedictines. Liberation theologians. Sedevacantists. What are all these various orders and branches, if not the result of Rome’s laissez faire attitude toward impurity? As long as each group is willing to remain within the huge tent of Rome, under the infallible papa, there is no compelling reason for family discipline. Catholicism, post Vatican II, is an extremely ambiguous religion. A Georgetown University survey in 2008 found that: 43% of Catholics do not believe that Jesus is really present in the eucharist; 88% of Catholics do not attend mass on Holy Days of Obligation; and 74% of Catholics do not go to Confession at least once a year, the minimum required by the Church! Clearly the majority of Catholics are RINO – Romish in Name Only. Catholic unity is an impure mirage.


Mark #3: It is a Lying Unity


In order to appear credible and desirable, Catholicism must have a veneer of truth. So the basic fundamentals of Christianity are found in Her. There is a growing movement toward unity based on the idea of “mere Christianity.” Since both Protestants and Catholics agree on the historic creeds, godly separation based on truth is deemed “scandalous.” Division is now considered to be the sinful wounding of the Body of Christ. Rome has the same “cast of characters” as revealed in God’s word (a self-existent and eternal Jehovah; a trinity of the Godhead; a mankind made in God’s image; a fall of Adam; a redemption of mankind by the incarnate Jesus; His death, resurrection and ascension; and His bodily return at the Last Day). But the interpretations and applications of these realities are diametrically opposed to true Christianity. Catholicism’s truth claims are superseded by layer upon layer of error. Rome claims that the Bible is the revelation of God, but contradicts the Word by adding a second source of divine revelation, Sacred Tradition. She usurps Christ’s authority with her popes, priests and wafers. Rome claims to control the Holy Spirit, calling Him down during baptisms and confirmations. The reality is that Catholicism holds sacred truths only to further her idolatrous lies.


There are many means that Rome has used to spread counterfeit unity. A recent tactic, quite powerful, is to enter into ecumenical agreements that are written deceptively. Then the agreements are used to further her aim of global religious and secular dominion. There is a lying spirit sent into the world, claiming to be the Queen of Heaven, that promotes Catholicism. And Rome uses her political power to entice evangelical organizations to join with her to fight the “culture wars.” The Catholic Church is utilitarian. The end justifies the means. The end is the promotion of a false, compromising,  and wicked unity under the papacy. The means are “whatever works” in the furtherance of her megalomania. Historically, Rome used forged documents to support her claim of apostolic succession (False Decretals) and her temporal dominion (Donation of Constantine). Many of the writings of the so-called “Church Fathers,” used to support extra-biblical doctrines, have been found to be forged or taken out of context. In short, she exhibits unity only through lies and counterfeits.


Mark #4: It is a Degrading Unity


God gave us our intellects to enable us to pursue the light of His truth. How can Rome assure the least controversy within the fold of her religion? She has declared herself to be infallible in all matters touching faith and morals. All discussion is over: Rome has spoken! The Pope, by virtue of his office, is infallible. He has “full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power that he can always exercise unhindered.” [4] The teaching of the Church (her Magisterium) is also infallible. As a result of this infallibility, faithful Catholics everywhere are taught to submit entirely to the religious hierarchy.  “Religious submission of the intellect and will must be given to a doctrine which the Supreme Pontiff or the college of bishops declares concerning faith or morals when they exercise the authentic magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim it by definitive act.”[5]  Priests must submit their minds and wills to their bishops by a vow of obedience. Bishops must submit their minds and wills in obedience to their superiors, on up to the pope. In such a manner, unity is promoted. But at what cost?


Historically, Rome endeavored to keep the Scriptures out of the hands of the laity, lest they be enticed to private judgment that might contradict her teaching. The Bible for centuries was included on Rome’s Index of Forbidden Books. She is like a helicopter parent, hoping to control all her children’s actions. To further ensure no conflicts arise that might endanger unity, she set up a system to keep “heretical” writings out of the hands of her children. All Catholic religious materials are censored. They must be granted the “Good Housekeeping seal of approval”: the Nihil Obstat and the Imprimatur


Wylie writes: “Put out the eyes of men, and there will be only one opinion about colour; extinguish the understandings of men, and there will be but one opinion regarding religion. This is what Rome does. With her rod of infallibility she touches the intellect and the conscience, and benumbs them into torpor.”[6]  Rome claims to “sit as Queen” of the conscience and intellect. She even expects dominion over the senses, telling her followers to deny the reality “bread and wine” and believe “body, blood, soul, and divinity.” In so doing, she degrades her followers.


Mark #5: It is an Enforced Unity


Having obtained submission of intellect and will from her subjects, Rome saw only one danger to unity. This danger is the light of truth that shines out of authentic Christians who dare to ignore her infallible fulminations. An important biblical doctrine is that of the remnant. From the time of the Roman persecution by the Caesars to the great outpouring of grace at the time of the Reformation, there has been a godly people that remained separate from the infallible “Church.” The Christians hidden in the Roman catacombs; the Ambrosians of the fourth through the eighth centuries; the Paulicians of the East; followed by the Waldensians and Albigenes who were hidden in the valleys of the Alps; the Wycliffites and Lollards of England; and the Hussites of Bohemia.


Rome set out with a vengeance to persecute and slaughter those peoples who dared to question her authority. The slaughter of the Albigenses (see Beziers), the founding of the Medieval Inquisition, the interdiction of England, and the wars against the Bohemians were some of the ways Rome sought to extinguish the light of the gospel. At the Reformation she redoubled her efforts, slaughtering the Huguenots of France (see St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre), hunting down all Protestants that she could using her inquisitions and treachery. The Society of Jesus was founded by Ignatius of Loyola to submit to and defend the papacy using all means necessary, including political espionage and assassinations.


There is no denying history. Rome has been a staunch opponent to religious liberty, and has persecuted the Church of Jesus Christ.


Mark #6: It is a Man-Made Unity


Investigation of the rise of the Roman spiritual empire reveals that it has always sought a man-made unity. This is a reflection of the human urge that commenced at the fall, when Eve succumbed to the serpent’s temptation (when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God). After the flood, we see this urge in the construction of the Tower of Babel (Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves). Rome follows suit, using building materials from three great civilizations: the Jews, the Greeks, and the Romans. From the Jews, Rome recreated the forms of the Jewish religion (that were meant to be only types pointing to fulfillment by Jesus). The Judaizing combination of faith and works, the physical temple, ceremonies and law-keeping, a priesthood, and a sacrificial system all descended from Israel to Rome. From the Greeks, Rome has built a philosophical system by which to amalgamate and justify her doctrines. And from Pagan Rome she has rebuilt Caesar and his pagan superstitions, from the design of miraculous medals, relics and scapulars to the intercession of dead men and women.


Wylie writes: “The Papacy is the most wonderful of all human systems. It stands alone, unrivalled and unapproached, throwing all former systems of error into the shade…The ancient polytheisms were comparatively simple in their plan and tolerant in their spirit. Not so the Papacy. It selects the worst passions of our nature, –the sensuality of the appetites, the idolatry of the heart, the love of wealth, the lust of dominion, pride, ambition, the desire to dictate the faith of others. It gives these passions the largest development of which they are capable; it combines and arranges them with exquisite skill, and thus enables them to act with the greatest effect. It is the most powerful organization that ever existed on the side of error and against the truth.”[7]


Rome is the “City of Man”; she opposes the “City of God.”


Mark #7: It is a Temporal Unity


In order to better accomplish her mission of domination, Rome has sought to combine the sacred with the secular. She has employed her armies. She has wielded authority over kings and princes since before the time of Charlemagne even to the present day. The Holy See is a religio-political entity, sending and receiving ambassadors to all nations. [The United States held out until 1984, when Ronald Reagan appointed the first ambassador to Rome]. Rome has terrorized entire nations with spiritual threats, denying her sacraments to entire nations until their leaders submitted to her authority (see interdicts). She has entered into concordats with numerous nations, seeking favorable treatment from governments in exchange for her influence. She received 1.75 billion lire through a concordat with Mussolini, and hundreds of millions of dollars arising from the concordat with Hitler. The Pope and his ambassadors travel the world, networking with politicians, and influencing foreign governments.


We see the strategy of combining the spiritual with the temporal in Rome’s attempts at ecumenical unity today. Two of her most ambitious projects are with Pentecostals and with politically conservative evangelicals. Both projects place the temporal over the spiritual. Pope Francis recently begged for unity with Pentecostals in a video he recorded for a Kenneth Copeland conference. He also requested prayer and asked for their blessing. “Be blessed!” bellowed Copeland and the leaders of Pentecostalism over and over in response to the pope’s request. In 1994 the notorious “Evangelicals and Catholics Together” movement was founded, which seeks unity in order to promote co-belligerence in the culture wars. This was followed in 2009 by the Manhattan Declaration, (or should it be called “City of Man”-hattan?) with similar cultural aims.


What does the Pope seek to get in returns for his ecumenical overtures? The compromise of the Gospel of Jesus Christ: the only thing standing in the way of Rome’s global supremacy.


It is a fundamental principal of the Papacy that the pope is Vicar of Christ on earth. Since Christ is both Head of the Church and King of Kings, the pope, as His sole representative on earth seeks both roles. By divine right he holds himself both bishop of bishops and king of kings. Wylie writes: “The object of the Papacy is, in brief, to exalt a man, or rather a class of men, to the supreme, undivided, and absolute control of the world and its affairs.”[8]


Mark #8: It is a Spiritually Impotent Unity


The gospel of Jesus Christ is “the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes.” Rom. 1:16. By the sovereign and mighty power of the Holy Spirit, men and women are born from above, die to self and are a new creation in Christ. We “like living stones are being built up as a spiritual house, to be a holy priesthood, to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.” 1Pet. 2:5. Those redeemed by Jesus belong to the City of God – we are citizens of heaven. But those who belong to the City of Man are bereft of heavenly spiritual power. That is not to say that they are without power, for the Evil One, the god of this world, gives out temporal powers within his dominion.


The counterfeit Roman religion has “the appearance of godliness, but denies its power.” 2 Tim. 3:5. We can bear Rome witness that she “has a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge.” She is bereft of spiritual light. She is a religion of dead idols, that like the lifeless Dagon must fall down before the true God. 1 Sam. 5:3. Looking at the distinctive doctrines of Rome, we find that there is:

  • No power…in a baptism that doesn’t regenerate
  • No power…in praying to saints who are doubly dead
  • No power…in priests who usurp the authority of Jesus
  • No power…in a fallible pope and magisterium
  • No power…in superstitious sacramentals
  • No power…in the idolatrous wafer-god of transubstantiation
  • No power…in the intercession of the false Queen Mary
  • No power…in moldy relics
  • No power…in indulgences, masses and penances
  • No power…in last rites
  • No power…in a false gospel that condemns its adherents

There is no spiritual power in the adulterous, impure, lying, degrading, persecuting, man-made, and temporally united religion of Rome – headed by the Pope. Where does one find true spiritual power? In the chaste, holy, honest, discriminating, persecuted, God-ordained, and spiritual church – headed by Jesus Himself.


Mark #9: It is a Condemned Unity


Does God warn us in His Word about a wealthy, pompous, religio-political, worldwide entity, headquartered in Rome, that would arise and enter into adulterous spiritual trysts, declare herself  sovereign over all humanity, degrade her followers, with doctrines founded on truth but entirely distorted by man-made traditions which are spiritually powerless, and who persecutes the saints of God? Why, yes! There is such a woman presented in chapters 17-20 of the book of Revelation. She is the woman wearing precious jewels, adorned in purple and scarlet, described as “Mystery, Babylon” (the great city of man), who is seated on seven hills (the Holy See of Rome), yet seated on many waters (wielding worldwide political power), with whom the politicians of the earth commit sexual immorality. She makes drunk her degraded followers, invents doctrines of demons, and is drunk with the blood of the saints. Does this not describe perfectly the Church of Rome? If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. Rome definitely passes the “duck test” of Revelation.


God will not permit this wicked woman to go unpunished. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great! She has become a dwelling place for demons, a haunt for every unclean spirit…For all nations have drunk the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality, and the kings of the earth have committed immorality with her…For this reason her plagues will come in a single day, death and mourning and famine, and she will be burned up with fire; for mighty is the Lord God who has judged her.” Rome, and all her false unity, is condemned by God.


Some evangelicals argue that there are multitudes of true born-again believers to be found within Catholicism, and say that this justifies rapprochement with Rome. There may be at any given time some Christians who are in the process of leaving Rome. But those who are truly trusting in Christ alone for salvation, and who are placing no confidence in the sacramental salvation of Rome, are not truly Catholic. God warns them, “Come out of her, my people, lest you take part in her sins.” Rev. 18:4. To remain in an idolatrous worship system, after receiving knowledge of the truth, is disobedient and foolish. 



Are You a Spiritual Terrorist?


Several months ago, I wrote an issue on the Charismatic Bridge to Rome. In the article, I mentioned South African “evangelical Anglican Bishop” Tony Palmer. Here is a link to another video, in which he states the following:

  • He and Pope Francis have covenanted to work for unity.
  • Francis consecrated Palmer to be a bridge to promote unity
  • It is a theological fact that we (Catholics and evangelicals) are one in Christ.
  • No denominational doctrine can destroy this fact.
  • Since 1999, the protest of Luther is over.
  • We are living in a post-Protestant era.
  • Even though our “Christian apartheid” is over, there are still many evangelicals who suffer from spiritual racism.
  • This is a sin against the cross; anything that causes division, when we elevate any doctrine, we place that above the cross.
  • The cross unites; that’s what makes us one – not doctrines.
  • Diversity is divine; it’s division that’s diabolical.
  • Christian unity is the basis of our credibility.
  • Division destroys our credibility.
  • Fear separates us; this fear is based on propaganda.
  • If there is no more protest, how can there be a Protestant Church?
  • Maybe now we are all Catholics again.
  • We now preach the same gospel.
  • We should throw more resources toward reconciliation than toward evangelism.
  • Otherwise, we are building walls without foundations.
  • I challenge you to find a bridge-builder, and back him or her.

My dear fellow Christians, I confess that I am a spiritual racist. I believe in spiritual apartheid. Not only that, I must be considered a spiritual terrorist in the eyes of the Pope, Tony Palmer, and his fellow ecumenists.


I lived the first ten years of my life in Buffalo, NY. In Buffalo there is a bridge to Canada called the “Peace Bridge.” The Pope, a/k/a the Pontiff or “bridge-builder” is seeking to lure unwary evangelicals across the “peace bridge” that spans the Tiber River into Rome – the “City of Man.” It is a frightful decision to abandon the evangel for the unity of Rome. It is said that “all things are possible with God.” But Heb. 6:5 says that it is impossible, in the case of those who have once tasted the heavenly gift and tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance. We need to do everything we can (with spiritual weapons) to blow up the “peace bridge” that leads to Rome. And we need to point Catholics to the “heavenly bridge” that crosses the river Jordan and leads to eternal life. That bridge is Christ, not the Roman pontiff.


Some of you, I’m sure, have seen the movie, Bridge on the River Kwai, the story of British POW’s forced to build a strategic bridge for the Japanese. One of the prisoners escapes, and eventually connects with a British Major in Ceylon. They return to Burma to plant dynamite and destroy the bridge. For all ex-Catholics, that should be our mission: having escaped the prison camp of Rome, we are to return and sabotage the strategic bridge leading back to the prison camp.


We live in the post-modern age of tolerance, where only the intolerant are not tolerated. What I have been arguing is probably considered “hate speech” in many countries. But the gospel is divisive and causes separation. The truncated gospel of “god has a wonderful plan for your life” is not the gospel. The true gospel is “repent, for the kingdom of God is at hand.” This gospel tells people they are wrong, and if they continue in their error they are bound for hell. In fact, they are condemned already. Despite the beliefs of the Pope and Tony Palmer, the protest is not over; the war is indeed still raging. May we be found to be good soldiers, persevering until the end.  



How can evangelicals answer the allegation of disobedient disunity? Some thoughts: 

  1. There exists a spiritual unity of all true Christians, despite appearances. This unity is based on the indwelling Spirit of Christ that binds them together.
  2. Even amid the diversity of evangelical churches, there is unity in essential matters, especially regarding justification.
  3. Even with numerous denominations, there are still marks of unity. David Murray, in the June 2014 issue of Tabletalk, lists various shades of cooperation: ecumenism, association, endorsement, and friendship. With Rome, there is an “all or nothing” attitude toward unity.
  4. The plan of God is to work through, and be glorified in, our weakness.
  5. There is no record in the NT of a super-hierarchy; there are geographical churches and even house churches.
  6. Unity in diversity is a display of God’s workmanship. God even uses separation to spread more widely His gospel.
  7. Disunity is unavoidable because of our sinful natures which are still present within us. Rome is delusional in claiming infallibility of teaching and the holiness of her adherents.
  8. Many small errors, spread out over numerous churches, is safer than one fatal error being enforced by a monolithic hierarchical structure. Sin is magnified in the Papacy.
  9. The Bible requires discernment by Christians, and calls for godly separation and church discipline.
  10. Challenges to unity promotes humility, patience and forbearance.
  11. No doctrine, no division; know doctrine, know division.
  12. “Do you think that I have come to give peace on earth? No, I tell you, but rather division.” Lk. 12:51.


Please check out the recommended books for this month: The History of the Papacy, by J.A. Wylie; The History of Protestantism, by J.A. Wylie. A Woman Rides the Beast, by Dave Hunt.


He Died on a Saturday – Death and the New Birth

May 23, 2014
Michael died on a Saturday in December. Here is his story.
For months, he felt ill at ease. Something just wasn’t right. Although he was a successful businessman and had a beautiful family, he felt somehow empty. He was desperately seeking, trying to find the secret to a happy and fulfilling life.
In June of 1990, Michael attended a six-day course that promised personal transformation. What he learned at the course was this: Be a man of integrity. Keep your word. So, for the next six months Michael tried as best he could to keep this advice. But he was still struggling.
One day he decided to follow through on one of his commitments.  He understood that to be a Catholic of integrity, he ought to obey the rules of Catholicism. So, on December 8th Michael attended mass on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, a Holy Day of Obligation. After the mass, he learned of a seminar to be held in the fellowship hall of the church. Michael peeked into the room and saw that a friend, his son’s Scout leader, was the one leading the seminar. Michael felt a little sorry for his friend, since there were only a couple people attending. He decided to go in. 
Right at the beginning Michael heard something that confused him. One of the instructors exclaimed “My favorite Bible verse is John 3:3 – Truly, truly I say to you, unless you are born again you cannot see the kingdom of God!” The man said it with such conviction that Michael was curious as to why he was so excited about this verse. But no further explanation was forthcoming.
Later in the seminar, his Scouting friend stood up and spoke of how Jesus, in the Sermon on the Mount, expanded the meaning of the commandments to include matters of the heart. To be angry with another is murder. To look at woman lustfully is adultery. As the seminar leader continued, Michael, who thought he was a “good Catholic” was becoming more and more guilty. “Maybe I’m not as “good” as I think I am. In fact, at times I’m pretty self-centered.”
At the end of the seminar, the instructor said, “If any of you want us to pray with you, come to the back of the room.” Michael thought for a few seconds, and decided to ask for prayer. He rose, went to his friend and the man who loved John 3:3, and said to them, “I would like prayer. I want God to forgive my sins.” The two men said, “okay”, and anointed Michael’s head with oil. [This would prepare for Michael’s death]. They laid hands on Michael, and while praying one of them said, “Michael, let go!” Immediately, Michael was flooded with emotions. He realized that he needed a Savior, and cried out, “Yes, LORD! Save me!”
 Immediately Michael died. His body hit the floor with a thud.
Jesus said to Nicodemus, “Do not be amazed that I said to you ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows where it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from and where it is going; so is everyone who is born of the Spirit.”
Michael came to realize that the Spirit had blown his way. He was born again. The law of Christ killed him: “I have died, and my life is hidden with Christ in God.” Col. 3:3. “I was made to die to the law, through the body of Christ.” Rom. 7:4. “Through the law, I died to the law.” Gal. 2:19. The thunderous law of God had struck Michael down; the resurrection power of Jesus Christ had raised him from the dead. He was a new creation. The “old Michael” had passed away, the “new Michael” had come. 2 Cor. 5:17.
Michael had repented (died) and believed the gospel (was raised).
Michael was ecstatic! He had inherited eternal life in heaven and the joy of belonging to Jesus here on earth. But one thing troubled him. Why was he not told of the new birth by his religion? This question sent him on a mission. He purchased the Catechism of the Catholic Church and read it from cover to cover. He found the following concerning the new birth:
CCC 1265: Baptism not only purifies from all sins, but also makes the neophyte “a new creature,” an adopted son of God, who has become a “partaker in the divine nature,” member of Christ and co-heir with him, and a temple of the Holy Spirit.”
The Catholic Church told Michael that he was born again as an infant when he was baptized. This flew in the face of what Michael saw as the clear testimony of Scripture and his personal experience. This became the first instance of Michael’s questioning the teaching of his Church. It was the seed that eventually grew into his leaving the Catholic religion.  


When Michael first became a Christian, he was amazed at the glorious book that is the Bible. He also loved to sing the praises of his Savior. One of his favorite songs was “New Lives for Old” by Wayne Watson. Here are some of the lyrics:

They say he ran a carnival, used to come to town,

’til one September afternoon, he just shut it down.
They tell me something happened, some say he lost his mind,
now most September afternoons, this is what you’ll find:
An old man on the corner, where he used to sell the show,
now he shouts what sounds like foolishness, as the people come and go:

New lives for old!

Warm hearts for cold!
Have I got a deal for you today,
come on step right this way!
Get your… new lives for old!

He puts it in the paper, he goes from door to door.

The people say, “He’s such a fool to come back for more.”

Old friends are mostly puzzled, they don’t know what to say,
’cause ever since that afternoon, he’s just been that way.
It’s like the old man died, and someone came to take his place!
Now he just stands out there bellowing, smile upon his wrinkled face:


New lives for old!

Warm hearts for cold!
Have I got a deal for you today,
come on step right this way!
Get your… new lives for old!


Now Michael loved his Catholic family, and was eager to share the story of his death and rebirth. He was surprised when they did not joyfully receive his testimony concerning his new life in Christ. They felt he was attacking their Catholic beliefs, and that he was wrong. His sister, thinking he had “lost his mind” even set up an appointment for him to see a psychiatrist. At first he was frustrated, but then he remembered that the Spirit blew when and where He chose; he would pray for his family. Eventually, Michael left the Catholic religion, and began attending an evangelical church that explained to him more fully the new birth that he had experienced.

Many times since the date of his death Michael has contemplated his former religion. He has been invited by his family to participate in Catholic masses and celebrations. At first he would attend; but soon he came to understand the importance of testifying to the truth. When invited to the baptisms of his niece’s and nephew’s infant children, Michael declined, explaining his conviction that the new birth did not occur at baptism. When invited to the sacrament of Confirmation he would again decline, explaining that the Holy Spirit is not received through the hands of a Catholic bishop. All the while, he has continued to pray for his family.
Although Michael was sad about his unbelieving family, he discovered a new family – his brothers and sisters in Christ. This eased some of the loneliness associated with his Catholic family’s unbelief.


“I, D. Michael Rudiger, have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me. I have died to the elementary principals of religion. I have died and my life is hidden with Christ in God. Christ bore my sins on His body on the cross, so that I might die to sin, and live to righteousness. For the love of Christ controls me, having concluded this, that He died for me, therefore I died; and He died for me, so that I might live no longer for myself, but for Christ who died for me and rose again for my behalf. Jesus was delivered over for my transgressions, and was raised for my justification. Having received the gift of repentance and faith to believe in Jesus, I have peace with God. I have been raised up with Christ and in my spirit I am even now seated in heaven with Christ at the right hand of God. I have experienced the first resurrection. Therefore the second death has no power over me. Halleluia! Come quickly, Lord Jesus!”

Identified with the righteous life, death, and the resurrection of Jesus,

Dale (11/23/56-12/8/90; 12/8/90 to forever)

Satan’s Nine Strategies for Keeping You Out of Heaven

January 27, 2014

Out of the Fire

Are you a brand snatched out of the fire (Zech. 3:2)? To be rescued is the desperate need of every sinner. But many do not recognize the danger. It is my earnest plea that those deceived by Satan will escape Hell’s eternal punishment by fleeing to Christ. In this article, I will use stories from the 9/11 World Trade Center (WTC) timeline as metaphors. I do this with some trepidation, knowing that memories of the attack are still vivid and troubling for many people. Please do not read too much into the metaphors. I do not use them to question the intentions of WTC personnel or victims, nor to question the wisdom of any decisions made that day. The metaphors are to demonstrate the serious consequences of our decisions and compare them to the consequences of religious deception.

There are 1,189 chapters in the Bible, but God used one single chapter to snatch me out of the fire. I call it the “smoke detector” chapter of the Bible. It is Colossians 2. Paul gives specific warnings concerning Satan’s three powerful strategies. He tells us: “let no one delude you” (Col. 2:4); “let no one take you captive” (Col. 2:8); and “let no one defraud you, acting as your judge” (Col. 2:16). I will explain how these three warnings relate to Satan’s master plan, and how Satan’s plan impacts Catholics.

Paul’s Three Warnings

 Warning #1: Let No One Delude You

Shortly after the first plane crashed into the North tower of the WTC, several P.A. announcements were made telling people it was safe; they should return to their offices. From 8:47 to 9:02 security officials at the base of the South Tower instructed people who had evacuated to head back up to their offices so as to avoid those evacuating the North Tower. Stanley Praimnath was persuaded and returned to his office on the 81st floor. He arrived at 9:01. At his desk, he watched as the second plane angled into the South Tower at 9:03. The wing of the aircraft tore through the 81st floor. The safety of the South Tower was an illusion. Many victims in both Towers had a false sense of security. No one thought a second plane would hit. No one thought the Towers would fall.

Having declared the abundant treasure found in the person and work of Christ, Paul warns us in Col. 2:4: “I say this so that no one will delude you with persuasive argument.” I am convinced that this warning is particularly applicable to four persuasive claims of the Catholic religion:

  • Rome teaches that she is the One True Church outside of which there is no salvation. The Catholic is persuaded “not to leave the building” — the safety of the Roman Catholic Church.
  • Rome claims to be the only Church that has the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus, in the sacrifice of the Mass.
  • Rome proclaims that the Pope is the only infallible interpreter of God’s word; he is Christ on earth (Catechism of the Catholic Church – CCC 882).
  • Rome claims that only her priests (acting as alter christus) are able to absolve Catholics of their sins. Salvation is through the Church’s sacraments.

These are powerful and attractive claims. Who wouldn’t want to belong to Christ’s true Church? Who wouldn’t want to receive the physical Christ? Who wouldn’t want certainty of doctrine? Who wouldn’t want the forgiveness that leads to heaven? The trouble is these Catholic claims are false, unbiblical and dangerous, as we shall see.

Warning #2: See to it that No One Takes You Captive 

Brian Clark was at his brokerage firm on the 84th floor of the South Tower when Flight 175 crashed several floors below his office. Given emergency training and supplied with a flashlight after the 1993 WTC bombing, Clark gathered seven colleagues and started down Stairway A. [This was the only staircase that remained intact from top to bottom].  Reaching the 81st floor, they encountered two people who were going up the stairwell to get to the roof to avoid the smoke and get fresh air. They claimed that the stairwell below them was impassable. While the group debated their next move, Clark heard a cry for help near the stairwell. Mr. Clark left the stairwell to free Stanley Praimnath who was trapped behind a wall under fallen debris. Returning to the stairwell, they were alone. The others had already ascended toward the roof. Clark and Praimnath chose to descend the stairs. They were two of only four people to survive who were at or above the impact zone. Those who went up to higher floors to escape the fire and smoke perished. Going up, they were trapped by the fire, with no means of escape.

In Col. 2:8, the Apostle Paul warns: “See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary spirits of the world, rather than according to Christ.” Rome teaches that Catholics are to seek other mediators beside Jesus. Supposedly these mediators provide spiritual assistance so that Catholics may achieve salvation.  Foremost is the Catholic Mary, who is considered the Co-Mediatrix of salvation: “Taken up to heaven she did not lay aside this saving office but by her manifold intercession continues to bring us the gifts of eternal salvation.” (CCC 969). Instead of fleeing to Christ alone for salvation, Catholics are instructed to “flee to the higher floors” where Mary, the Saints, the Pope, and the priests reside. They are taken captive (trapped) by these “elemental spirits.”  Christ, the only way out, is hidden from them. They head in the wrong direction and fail to “exit the building,” and find salvation “outside the camp where Christ is” (Heb. 13:13). “There is a way that seems right to man, but its end is the way of death” (Prov. 14:12).

Warning #3: No One is to Defraud You by Acting as Your Judge 

Almost 2,000 years ago, another tower located in the south end of a great city collapsed.  This occurred in the city of Jerusalem. The Tower of Siloam fell. Jesus spoke of this tragedy to drive home a critical issue concerning salvation. He said, “Or do you suppose that those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them were worse culprits than all the men who live in Jerusalem? I tell you, no, but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish” (Luke 13:4-5). The scribes and Pharisees, leaders of the Jews, committed two evils. They focused on externals, and they ignored internals.  They added man-made traditions, and judged the people based on their obedience to these traditions. They subtracted the weightier issue, the condition of the heart. We use a common expression for repentance: a “change of heart.” Unless a person’s heart is changed, he or she will not see the kingdom of God (Jn. 3:3; Acts 11:18). Jesus confronted the Jewish leaders, saying: “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence. You blind Pharisee, first clean the inside of the cup and of the dish, so that the outside of it may become clean also” (Mt. 23:25).

Paul’s third warning: “Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day – things which are a shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ. Let no one keep defrauding you of your prize by delighting in self-abasement and the worship of angels [Veneration of Saints?], taking his stand on visions [Marian Apparitions?] he has seen, inflated without cause by his fleshly mind, and not holding fast to the head…Why, as if you were living in the world, do you submit yourself to decrees such as, ‘Do not handle, do not taste, do not touch!’ (which all refer to things destined to perish with use) – in accordance with the commandments and teaching of men?” (Col. 2:16-22).

Rome dilutes (actually, negates) the saving gospel of Jesus Christ by adding man-made traditions, such as mandatory fasts and Holy Days of Obligation. Catholics are promised that if they obey the Church’s five precepts, they will accomplish the “indispensable minimum in the spirit of prayer and moral effort” (CCC 2041-2043). By declaring salvation through meeting five external requirements, Rome defrauds Catholics by subtracting what is truly necessary to receive salvation. They omit the righteousness of Christ that is received through repentance and faith. They are told that salvation is through habitually “doing penance,” a form of self abasement.

Paul concludes Colossians 2 as follows: “These are matters which have, to be sure, the appearance of wisdom in self-made religion and self abasement and severe treatment of the body, but are of no value against fleshly indulgence.” (Col. 2:24). Self-discipline and adherence to rules and ceremonies (as a means of salvation) provide no refuge from the “flames of passion.” To the contrary, legalism tends to fan the flames of sin. For the law was given to accentuate sin, that we might recognize our need and flee to Christ (Gal. 3:19; Rom. 10:5-10). Through repentance and faith, we become “new creations” (2 Cor. 5:17).  The inside of our cup is cleaned, and we show our gratitude by following Christ.

Though we deserve an eternal fate no better than those who died in the collapse of Siloam, we receive mercy. Jesus told the legalistic Pharisees to “Go and learn what this means: I desire mercy, not sacrifice, for I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners” (Mt. 9:13).

The Strategies of Satan

Here are the strategies that Satan employs to keep people out of heaven and in the domain of eternal fire. Jesus is the Way, the Truth and the Life. Therefore, Satan seeks to:

1) Replace the way (gospel), the truth (Scripture) and the life (church) through delusion,

2) Hide the way, the truth, and the life through deception, and

3) Dilute the way, the truth and the life through fraudulent addition and subtraction.

Satan has produced a masterpiece that does all nine (3×3) of these – the Roman Catholic religion.

1)      Jesus (the Way) is replaced by a piece of bread; He is replaced by the priest (alter Christus); and He is replaced by the Pope (Vicar of Christ).

2)      Jesus is hidden behind many mediators (Pope, priest, Mary, Saints, Church, Sacraments).

3)       The gospel is diluted by the addition of works and ceremonies.

4)      The truth (Jesus, the Word) is replaced by an infallible Magisterium, the teaching authority that subjugates the conscience of the Catholic.

5)      The truth is hidden by convincing Catholics that only Rome can correctly interpret the meaning of Scripture. Historically, the Church placed the Bible on the “Index of Forbidden Books, withholding it from the laity.

6)      The truth is diluted by a second source of revelation, known as “Holy Tradition.”

7)      The life of Jesus (His body, the Church) is replaced by an institution claiming to be the One, True Church.

8)      The church is hidden through deception. Rome claims a false apostolic authority, supported by forgeries (False Decretals) and improper interpretations based on the so-called “Church Fathers.” Historically, it was considered a “mortal sin” for a Catholic to even enter a Protestant church.

9)      Rome dilutes the church by claiming that Jews, Muslims, Separated Brethren, Hindus, and even sincere atheists are mystically added to her saving barque (CCC 836-845). And she subtracts true Christians, former Catholics who have left her fold (CCC 846).

The Roman Catholic Church is truly a “Synagogue of Satan” (Rev. 3:9). Satan is the Antichrist (replacer), the Deceiver (hider of truth), the Father of Lies (adder), and the Thief (subtracter). Satan wants to fraudulently steal the deed to your eternity. He will accomplish this by keeping you from Jesus. I urge you to consider the question, “Where is Jesus?” Paul answers this question in Col. 3:1 – he is “seated at the right hand of God.” Jesus warns, “Enter through the narrow gate, for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it. For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it.” (Mt. 7:13-14). Jesus is this gate. You must “flee the building,” the broad way of false religion, and enter through Him. Christians are warned to flee idolatry. Catholicism is a religion of idolatry.

Urgent Action is Necessary

Neither Brian Clark nor Stanley Praimnath thought that the towers would collapse. They did not have a sense of urgency. Arriving on the 31st floor, they found some working telephones. They both made personal calls, and then Brian waited over three minutes on 911 to report a medical emergency on the 44th floor. When they finally exited the Tower, rescue workers advised them to run to avoid falling debris. When they had gotten about two blocks away, they found shelter near Trinity Church. Suddenly, Praimnath turned to Clark and said “I think the towers are going to collapse.” Clark started to argue otherwise when he turned and witnessed the horrific implosion of the South Tower.

My friend, your time may be running short.  (1) You do not know the day of your death. You could be facing an eternity in hell much sooner than you think. (2) You may become hardened in your sin, and may lose any interest in seeking the Savior. My Catholic father, grieved by his sinful behaviors and his failure to measure up to his religion, gave in to hopelessness. (3) The Lord promises to return in judgment, on a day known only by the Father. A voice from Heaven shouts: “Come out of her, my people, so that you will not participate in her sins and receive her plagues…she will be burned up with fire; for the Lord God who judges her is strong” (Rev. 18:4, 8). The Roman Catholic religion is destined to fall. “Her smoke will rise up forever and ever” (Rev. 19:3). Please do not continue to let Satan and Catholicism hide Jesus from You! Flee to the Savior while there is still time!

The Heroes of 9/11 – A Type of Christ

We celebrate the heroism of the police and fireman who sacrificed their lives on 9/11. These heroes may be seen as a “type of Christ.” They gave their lives to save others. Similarly, Jesus willingly laid down his life for His sheep. The Port Authority police stayed at their posts and finished their work unto death. Jesus stayed attached to His post, and cried out “It is finished.”

We all have a sin problem. We all need to be rescued from the building. Unless we repent, we will all perish. We must be carried to safety in the arms of the Eternal Fireman. Jesus endured the fiery hell of God’s wrath on the cross as our substitute. Through faith in Him, we receive the flame-proof garments of his righteousness. Satan stands to accuse us – for our filthy clothing testifies against us. But Jesus rebukes Satan, and orders that our filthy garments be replaced by His festal robes (Zech. 3:1-5). Our iniquity is taken away, and replaced with Christ’s righteousness. What should be our response? As a nation, we are grateful for the courageous acts of the first responders. As Christians, much more should we display gratitude for the saving acts of Jesus. He grants forgiveness of sin by His sacrificial death. He grants righteousness through His sinless, resurrected life.

We need a hero, because no one is able to span the infinite distance from earth to heaven. Our sin separates us. I leave you with lyrics from the Point of Grace song The Great Divide:

There’s a bridge to cross the great divide A way was made to reach the other side The mercy of the Father, cost His son His life His love is deep, His love is wide There’s a cross to bridge the great divide 

Postscript: A Word to My Fellow Evangelicals, Especially Former Catholics 

Listening to the miraculous personal testimony of Brian Clark, I could not help seeing him as a “type of Christian.”  Before proceeding, please watch Brian’s testimony here:

The Marks of the Christian Evangelist

  • Brian, a volunteer fire marshal, was equipped to save people from disaster. As Christians, we are equipped with the gospel of salvation.
  • Brian was guided to the correct stairway. As Christians, we receive the divine guidance of the Holy Spirit.
  • When Brian was stopped on the 81st floor, Stanley noticed his flashlight. This caused him to cry for help. As Christians, our light should so shine that we are noticed, that it “gives      light to all who are in the house” (Mt. 5:15).
  • Brian was compelled to seek out Stanley and rescue him. As Christians, we are compelled to represent Christ and rescue sinners with the gospel.
  • Brian was miraculously protected when he went in to find Stanley. As Christians, we are protected during fiery trials by the helmet of salvation.
  • When Brian pulled Stanley out of the rubble, Stanley was overcome with gratitude. He cried out, “Hallelujah, I’ve been saved!” As Christians, we share in the joy of the salvation of the lost.
  • Stanley then cried out, “We’ll be brothers for life!” At this point, Brian noticed that both he and Stanley had wounds on the palm of their hands. He grabbed Stanley’s hand, pressed it      to his, and said, “In fact, we’ll be blood brothers for life.” As Christians, those who receive the gospel truly become our blood brothers. “For henceforth let no one bother me, for I bear on my body the brand-marks of Jesus” (Gal. 6:17).
  • The meeting of Brian and Stanley was providential. As Christians sharing the gospel, we are to be on the lookout for “divine appointments.”
  • Brian still needed to lead Stanley out of the burning building. As Christians, we are to lead immature believers out of      false religion and into the pure air of true worship.
  • Brian eventually led Stanley to the shelter of a church. As Christians, it is our responsibility to help establish those we evangelize by discipling them and baptizing them into the local      church.
  • Throughout the trial, Brian was protected by a strange peace. When enduring trials, Christians receive the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, which guides our hearts and minds in Christ Jesus (Phil. 4:7).
  • Looking back on his experience, Brian realized that he should not ask unanswerable questions, such as “Why me?” As Christians, we do one thing: we press on, forgetting what lies behind and reaching forward to what lies ahead (Phil. 3:13).

As “found sinners” we are responsible for reaching out to those who are in bondage to false religion. We must be ready to warn the deceived and to overcome their objections. On the 81st floor, Brian encountered a large woman who blocked the stairwell. She claimed the way out was blocked, and urged Brian to join her by going up to the roof. Hearing this part of Brian’s testimony made me consider how difficult it is for Catholics to overcome the persuasive pull of their religion. Besides theological issues, there are the cultural and family connections which keep Catholics in bondage. And there are false ecumenical teachers who seek communion with Catholicism, thereby leading astray both Catholics and unwary evangelicals.

We live in treacherous times. It appears that we are in the midst of apostasy. But God has His elect who will be saved from Satan’s darkness and brought into the light of Christ. May we be bold in seeking them out and leading them to the Savior!

25 Ways to Subvert the Gospel

February 22, 2013

In my last newsletter, I wrote a tongue-in-cheek analogy “Ecumenical Mathematicians.” These Mathematicians hoped to prove that “one” equals “two.” I based the article on the Evangelicals and Catholics Together (ECT) document: The Gift of Salvation. This ecumenical document made the bold claim that Evangelicalism and Catholicism agree on the gospel. In other words, that “one” equals “two.”

The document sounds so full of evangelical words and arguments – it is a marvelous counterfeit. And for this reason, it is extremely dangerous. As a follow-up, I have decided to review the document to uncover its distortions, deceptions, and outright lies.

You may ask, “Why are you so concerned with a document from 1997?” Well, since this document came out there has been a steady Romeward march. Other ecumenical reports have been released that use similar reasoning. For example, the Lutheran-Catholic Accord (1999), the Anglican Roman Catholics International Commission Accords (ARCIC – 1986 and ongoing), the Manhattan Declaration (2009), and the joint statement on missions between the World Evangelical Alliance, World Council of Churches, and the Papacy (2011). An ecumenical document between the Baptist World Alliance and the Papacy is still in process and has not yet been released. This is a follow-up to the Baptist/Catholic document released in 1990: “Christian Witness in Today’s World”

I have gleaned 25 falsehoods from the document. The passages from The Gift of Salvation are in italics:

1) Evangelicalism and Catholicism are different ways of being Christian.

ECTII: “We give thanks to God that in recent years many Evangelicals and Catholics, ourselves among them… acknowledge one another as brothers and sisters in Christ.”

False! Where there is no gospel (or a false one), there is no Christianity. The Roman Catholic religion is not a Christian religion.

2) We both rely on the Bible.

ECT II: “We affirm the binding authority of Holy Scriptures, God’s inspired Word.”

False! Catholicism holds that both Tradition and the infallible teaching office of the Catholic Church (the Magisterium) are additional God-inspired sources of revelation. All Catholics must “receive with docility” the infallible teachings of the Pope and the Bishops. These teachings, not the Scriptures, are the “binding authority” for the Catholic.

Also, Catholicism adds apocryphal books to the Scriptures.

3) We both follow the same creeds.

ECT II: “We acknowledge the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds as faithful witnesses to that Word.”

False! Each group has a different understanding of the meaning of the Creeds. For example, the Apostles’ Creed states: “[I believe] in the forgiveness of sins.” How and when forgiveness occurs is relevant to the gospel. Must our sins be continually confessed to a priest? “[I believe] in the holy Catholic Church.” Do we hold to the same understanding of these words? I think not! And so it goes.

4) The document was inspired by the Holy Spirit.

ECT II: “The Holy Spirit…calls and empowers us to confess together the meaning of the salvation promised….”

False! In discussing the meetings leading to the first ECT document, Chuck Colson writes: “In the course of our conversations, it dawned upon a number of participants, almost simultaneously, as though by the prompting of the Holy Spirit: ‘Here is the Church. Here around this table. Christ is here, his gospel is being spoken, and therefore his Church is here….'”

The Holy Spirit does not deal in lies and wordsmithing. These deceptive ECT documents were not inspired by Him!

5) Our differences are not critical to the gospel.

ECT II: “We have found that, notwithstanding some persistent and serious differences, we can together bear witness to the gift of salvation….”

False! There is only one gospel, as Paul makes clear in Galatians 1:8-9. All other gospels are anathema. The errors of Catholicism are fatal.

6) We both acknowledge the one Mediator.

ECT II: “For he is ‘the one mediator between god and men….'”

False! Catholicism has a multitude of mediators. What about the pope, the priest, Mary and the Saints? According to the Catholic Encyclopedia: “When special friends of God- angels, saints, holy men – plead our cause before God they mediate ‘with Christ’; their mediation is only secondary and is better called intercession.”

Catholics look to other mediators to help “complete” their justification.

7) We agree on redemption.

ECT II: “Always it is clear that the work of redemption has been accomplished by Christ’s atoning sacrifice on the cross. ‘Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law…'”

False! Here is the Catholic teaching on the adequacy of our redemption, from the Catholic Encyclopedia: “It is only through, and in the measure of, our co-operation that we appropriate to ourselves the satisfactions and merits of Christ.” Catholics and evangelicals have entirely different means of salvation. Catholics merit eternal life through their works in cooperation with the Catholic Church. Evangelicals receive eternal life through faith alone. We are eternally redeemed by the work of Christ: “but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, having obtained eternal redemption” (Heb. 9:12).

8) We agree that justification is by our faith in Christ.

ECT II: “The New Testament is clear that the gift of justification is received through faith.”

False! In Catholicism, justification is initially received through baptism. Since most Catholics are baptized as infants, it is the faith of the parents and the church that are deemed effective in the waters of baptism. But this “gift” is only temporary. Salvation becomes a process, dependent on the infant Catholic’s future cooperation with the Church.

9) We agree that justification is not earned by our works.

ECT II: “Justification is not earned by any good works or merits of our own… [it is] conferred through the Father’s sheer graciousness.”

False! Catholicism teaches that initial justification (the first plank) is conferred through baptism. Since baptism is passively received, the Catholic may claim it is not a work. Baptism begins the process of meriting salvation: “no one can merit the initial grace of forgiveness and justification, at the beginning of conversion. Moved by the Holy Spirit and charity, we can then merit for ourselves and others the graces needed… for the attainment of eternal life.” (CCC 2010 – italics in original).

Final justification (the second plank) must indeed be merited. How can a person merit a gift? Catholicism attempts to solve this riddle by defining two kinds of merit: condign and congruent. One cannot strictly deserve grace. But having been initially “graced,” we can merit further grace that is congruent with our efforts. It is equitable for God to reward these efforts. This is philosophical gobbledy gook.

10) We agree that by faith in Jesus our salvation is effective.

ECT II: “By faith, which is also the gift of God, we repent of our sins, and freely adhere to the Gospel, the good news of God’s saving work for us in Christ.”

False! Evangelicals believe that the ground of our justification is Christ’s righteousness imputed to our account at the moment of belief; we are clothed “in Christ.” Catholics adhere to their “Gospel” by receiving infused graces (a lifelong process) via the sacraments. Catholics merit salvation by cooperating with the Church of Rome. Evangelicals have “repented and trusted Christ.” Catholics must continually “do penance, and trust the Church.”

11) We agree that justification is sola fide.

ECT II: “We understand that what we affirm is in agreement with what the Reformation traditions have meant by justification by faith alone (sola fide).”

False! The reformers would not recognize these wordsmithed descriptions of justification. No forthright, intelligent evangelical would declare that Rome agrees to sola fide. The writers of ECT II are not forthright. They are deceptive.

The Reformation teaching on justification was declared anathema at the Council of Trent. These anathemas are in effect today.

12) Surely no one is ever saved by merely knowing the doctrine of sola fide!

ECT II: “God’s gift is never dependent upon our human experience or our ways of expressing that experience.”

False! J. I. Packer has defended ECT by stating: “What brings salvation, after all, is not any theory about faith in Christ, justification, and the church, but faith itself in Christ himself.” R. C. Sproul calls this a red herring. “Who has ever maintained that doctrinal theory ever saved anyone?… The issue is not, Does doctrine save or Christ save? The issue is, What is the gospel that must be the basis of any shared mission of faith?”

God’s gift is entirely dependent on the means He has determined. He has determined that justification is by faith alone. Sadly, Catholics are not trusting in Christ for their salvation. They instead entrust their souls to the Catholic Church. The means of justification for the Catholic are baptism and obedience to the Church.

13) We agree on the doctrine of baptism.

ECT II: “By baptism we are visibly incorporated into the community of faith and committed to a life of discipleship.”

False! The statement is deceptive. Some evangelicals would agree that baptism is a public (visible) affirmation of faith in Christ. Others would see “life of discipleship” and agree that infant baptism brings children into the covenant. But for Catholics, baptism imparts sanctifying grace, regenerating the recipient of the sacrament. This grace is lost if one commits a mortal sin – they have effectively been “unincorporated.” They may become “reincorporated” through the Sacrament of Penance. Evangelicalism and Catholicism have two radically different systems of theology concerning baptism.

The ECT II statement on baptism begs the question: “Which community of faith?” When Presbyterians receive baptism, are they incorporated into the Catholic Church?

14) We agree on sanctification.

ECT II: “Sanctification is not fully accomplished at the beginning of our life in Christ….”

False! For evangelicals, sanctification is distinct from, and follows, justification. Sanctification is guaranteed by virtue of justification (Rom. 8:30). For Catholics there is no guarantee, for one must be sanctified before they are fully justified. Catholics are not declared righteous based on the imputed righteousness of Christ. They must become fully holy before they are fully justified. They become holy through sacramental infusions of grace, from Baptism to “Last Rites.”

15) We agree on forgiveness.

ECT II: “When we fail, we can still turn to God in humble repentance and confidently ask for, and receive, his forgiveness.”

False! In Rome’s system, forgiveness is dependent on participation in the sacraments, especially Penance. Sins must be confessed to the priest. No serious sins may be withheld and left unconfessed – otherwise none of the person’s sins are forgiven. Making an improper confession is itself a serious sin. Plus, the punishment for sins remains, even after pardon is received. Punishment is remitted by performing satisfaction, obtaining indulgences, and undergoing purification in purgatory.

16) Assurance of salvation is available for both Evangelicals and Catholics.

ECT II: “We may therefore have assured hope for the eternal life promised to us in Christ.”

False! There is no assurance of salvation for Catholics, since they are not justified until after death. Assurance of salvation was anathematized at the Council of Trent. It is the sin of presumption. Catholic “hope” is based on participation in the sacraments, persevering to the end in order to merit salvation. For evangelicals, assurance is a fruit of their justification. We are assured because we belong to Christ and have received his righteousness, the righteousness that comes through faith (Rom. 10:3).

17) We agree on the purpose of suffering.

ECT II: “As we have shared in his sufferings, we will share in his final glory.”

False! Our suffering contributes nothing to our justification. For Catholics, suffering is part and parcel of justification. One is justified through “redemptive suffering.”

18) We agree that God saves justified sinners.

ECT II: “Thus it is that as justified sinners we have been saved, we are being saved, and we will be saved.”

False! For evangelicals, God justifies the ungodly. For Catholics, God does not ultimately justify sinners. One must be inherently righteous (after death) in order to be declared righteous. Catholic “justification” can come and go like the tides, as Catholics are buffeted by their sin.

19) Evangelicals and Catholics are both able to share the gospel.

ECT II: “As believers we are… commissioned to be bearers of the good news.”

False! Evangelicals have the gospel. Catholics have a false hope which is not a gospel. This statement employs the fallacy of “begging the question.” It assumes what it sets out to prove. The two “gospels” are contradictory.

20) It is important for Catholics to evangelize evangelicals.

ECT II: “We must share the fullness of God’s saving truth…Catholics to evangelicals… so that “we all reach unity in the faith.”

False! The document supposes that Catholicism is able to bring “fullness” of salvation to evangelicals. Is unity between Catholics and evangelicals critical to the gospel? Catholicism claims that the “separated brethren” should return to the mother church to receive the full gospel. Unfortunately, some evangelicals are seduced by Rome’s false claims.

21) If we keep talking, we can eventually work it out.

ECT II: “While we rejoice in the unity we have discovered… we recognize that there are necessarily interrelated questions that require further and urgent exploration.”

False! Rome will never change concerning the gospel. How could she, and remain infallible? All movement toward unity has been (and will be) from the Protestant camp. Whether from a desire to defend our Judeo-Christian ethics, to evangelize Muslims, or to befriend unwary Catholics with the true gospel, all reasons for rapprochement with Rome are wrong.

NO UNITY HAS BEEN DISCOVERED! Stop your rejoicing.

22) We will strive to answer the difficult questions that remain.

ECT II: “We are committed to examining these questions further in our continuing conversations.”

False! It is IMPOSSIBLE to reconcile these contrary beliefs. There is no possible “synthesis” when it comes to the gospel. The ECT’ers have generated seven documents to date. None has clarified any of the issues raised concerning the meaning of regeneration or diverse understandings of merit and reward, or purgatory, or indulgences, or Marian devotion, or the intercession of the saints, etc.

23) We can witness better as a team.

ECT II: “All who truly believe in Jesus are brothers and sisters in the Lord and must not allow their differences, however important, to undermine this great truth, or deflect them from bearing witness together…”

False! It is not those who truly believe that are saved. Rather, it is those who believe the truth. It is claimed by certain evangelicals that there are many Catholics who are “truly saved” and don’t know it. If you truly love Catholics, you must truly reject this truly untrue premise. Don’t tell them they already have the gospel. Share the gospel with them! Contrary to popular belief, the Protestant Reformation was not a tragedy that split asunder the Church. The gospel was recovered from the darkness of Roman captivity. We must not become yoked with Rome. The gospel, the power of God unto salvation, is at stake.

24) As conservative people of conviction, we both profess the gospel.

ECT II: “As evangelicals who thank God for the heritage of the Reformation and affirm with conviction its classic confessions, as Catholics who are conscientiously faithful to the teaching of the Catholic Church… we affirm our unity in the Gospel that we have here professed.”

False! The only unity that this document promotes is a deceptive ecumenical unity that compromises the truth of the gospel. These folks are promoting a “third gospel.” There is the true gospel. There is the so-called Catholic “gospel.” The ECT’ers are promoting the false “gospel” of ecumenism.

At least the Council of Trent was straightforward in condemning the gospel. These evangelical ecumenicists are not the noble enemy. They are deceptive troublers within the camp.

25) We are men of integrity.

ECT II: “We seek no unity other than unity in the truth. Only unity in the truth can be pleasing to the Lord….”

False! This document abounds in undefined terms, wordsmithing, convergeance ecumenism, minimization of critical truths, and outright deception. It violates multiple rules of logic and argumentation.

It is indeed troubling that notable evangelicals could be so blind to their lack of integrity.

There is more in this document that could be condemned. But to conclude, ecumenical documents such as The Gift of Salvation cause much confusion. They promote what John MacArthur calls a “Reckless Faith” that feeds upon a lack of discernment. My fear is that many will be led astray to the false church of Rome; that many evangelicals will become unequally yoked with Roman Catholics; and that the light of the Gospel will be hidden to future generations. Far from promoting unity, these ecumenical documents only cause further division among evangelicals.

Let us stand firm, together proclaiming the only true gospel. For a detailed discussion of ECT II: The Gift of Salvation, and the ecumenical movement in general, I highly recommend the book “On the Edge of Apostasy – The Evangelical Romance with Rome” by Rob Zins.

The Greatest of All Protestant Heresies is…

February 13, 2013

Sola Fide? Sola Scriptura?

Sinclair Ferguson answers this question here.

Te’o’s “Girlfriend” and “Notre Dame”…

January 18, 2013

…both are hoaxes.

Hoax: ” Something that has been established or accepted by fraudulent means.”

The Notre Dame linebacker allegedly taken in by an internet scam.

The millions of Catholics taken in by a religious scam.

Both Lennay Kekua and “Our Lady” Queen of Heaven are frauds.



Resources to Evangelize Catholics: Interview with Mike Gendron

January 3, 2013

Proclaiming the Gospel Ministries has many good resources for evangelizing your Catholic family and friends. Mike Gendron was interviewed on “No Compromise Radio” recently. It is well worth a listen.

Here is the link to the interview.

When Was Abraham “Saved?”

December 31, 2012

Commenter Nick asks several important questions regarding the faith of Abraham in his comment on when Abraham was justified. He writes:

“You had said: “This obedient act (Gen. 22) occurred many years after Abraham’s gospel justification (Gen. 15).”

Seeing that Abraham was a believer long before Genesis 15, starting as early as Genesis 12 (see Hebrews 11:8 and Galatians 3:8), how do you know the Genesis 15 event was not simply a “shown to be righteous” event as well? It seems like it would be Pelagianism to suggest Abraham was not saved until Genesis 15.”

In Genesis 12, the LORD tells Abram to “go forth from your country, and from your relatives, and from your father’s house, to the land which I will show you; And I will make you a great nation, and I will bless you, and make your name great; and so you shall be a blessing; and I will bless those who bless you…and in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.”

Abram, in obedience, proceeded to the land of Canaan. He trusted God. Was Abram justified (credited with righteousness) in Genesis 12 based on his response of faith? Several issues need to be addressed.

The first issue relates to the content of faith. In Genesis 15, Abram believed God’s promise of a child that would be miraculously born, and through whom the promise would be fulfilled. This promise of a future child was initially made to Adam and Eve in Genesis 3:15, and would come through the line of Seth, her third-born son. All the Old Testament saints believed in the promise of the one who would remove the curse that resulted from the fall. The promise of Isaac to Abram, via his barren wife Sarai, foreshadowed the coming Messiah, Jesus. It is by faith in Jesus alone that one is justified. The OT saints looked forward to Jesus. We NT saints look backward.

Another issue raised by Nick: Since Abram trusted God by leaving for Canaan, was he not saved then? I think this question touches on what is known as the ordo salutis, or “order of salvation.” Protestants believe that justification is by faith alone. But how does this work out? I believe that salvation is a gift of God from first to last. Ephesians 2:8-9 states: “For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, so that no one may boast.” But some may say, “but don’t we have to receive the gift of faith? Doesn’t our wise choice present some merit on our part?” This touches on the question of free will, and the resulting question raised by Nick about Pelagianism.

Getting back to the ordo salutis, some teach that it is the Word that regenerates the soul, resulting in justification. Thus, we are called to share the “good news” of the gospel. Those who believe are justified. But who will believe? Don’t some reject the word? How then can it be the gospel/word that is the initial cause? I believe that before the Word can do its work, there must be a gift given that is passively received, so that there is a positive response to the message. This is the gift of life imparted directly by the Holy Spirit – the soul is quickened. I highly recommend a chapter from A. W. Pink that discusses quickening. Here is a link to this discussion.

Getting back to Abram, he obeyed God in Genesis 12. Perhaps Abram was already quickened (but not yet justified) and began hungering for spiritual things at this point. Like many of us, his spiritual journey included many rabbit trails. For example, he did not obey God fully when he brought Lot along with him to Canaan. He was told to leave his relatives. Also, he sojourned to Egypt, and deceived Pharaoh about his wife being his sister.

The point I want to make is this: salvation is indeed a process, that begins with quickening, proceeds to justification, and sanctification, and finally glorification. So, Abram trusted God back in Genesis 12, and perhaps he was even justified back then. He may have been trusting in the promised seed. But Genesis 15 clearly shows that our justification is the result of a specific kind of faith, saving faith in Messiah. It is not as important to nail down “when” Abram was justified. What is very important is the ground of his justification: faith in the coming promised One. Abram believed, and as a result was “reckoned” righteous. I am an accountant by trade, and “reckoned” is “accounted.” We Protestants believe that the righteousness of Jesus is credited to us, at the time of belief in the gospel. And that works of obedience are the fruit of our justification.

Nick, I hope this helps to clarify the Protestant understanding of justification. We believe that there is an unbreakable chain of salvation. All who are quickened will be glorified. And no one is able to receive the gift of salvation unless they are made spiritually alive by the Holy Spirit’s quickening (Jn. 3:8).

Thanks again for your comment.